The next question has to be: If co-operatives are not the means to the desired end, what is?
I thought I'd fallen upon the answer recently when I spotted an article in the New Internationalist which outlined a road map to a sustainable future but it entailed all sorts of legislation and tax changes which I couldn't imagine could possibly be enacted. We all know that huge corporations call the tune and I can't believe that they would 'allow' national governments to pass legislation which would hinder their operations or 'allow' international agreements which went against their interests.
I've just about had enough of gloom and doom with people telling me what hasn't been successful in taking us to a better world, so I've now got hold of 'One No, Many Yeses' to see what is happening and will take a look at 'Redesigning Civilisation with Permaculture' by Toby Hemenway and some of the website links people have kindly sent to me.
Just hope they aren't full of academic-speak and long-winded explanations ... I'm looking for a simple answer!
Like to say with respect that it is not a better future that I want, it is a better present.
ReplyDeleteThe means to a sustainable end? How about paying proper respect to nature and the environment and other species and we live for companionship not profit.
sitting quietly
doing nothing
the seasons come and go
the grass grows itself
Thanks for that - beautifully said.
DeleteIf you want a simple answer, you need to find a simple question.
ReplyDeleteFelt a bit irritated when I first read this comment. Not sure why. Perhaps because it's right. The closest I can come to just now is: 'How can we find a way of organising life on Earth which allows humans to flourish* while respecting the lives of other species and protecting the natural environment'. I think I'd settle for that.
ReplyDelete* (a good definition of this in Tim Jackson's 'Prosperity Without Growth')